Key result
Expiratory-gated transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) combined with slow breathing at 0.1 Hz did not further augment vagally mediated heart rate variability compared to slow breathing with sham stimulation.
Why the study?
Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on vagally mediated heart rate variability are inconsistent, prompting investigation into whether combining it with slow breathing produces synergistic effects.
Does expiratory-gated taVNS combined with slow breathing improve vagally mediated heart rate variability in healthy individuals?
RCT (n=22)
Single-blind
Random and counterbalanced
No
Does expiratory-gated taVNS combined with slow breathing improve vagally mediated heart rate variability in healthy individuals?
Expiratory-gated taVNS at 100 Hz does not acutely augment vagally mediated heart rate variability beyond the effects of slow breathing alone in healthy individuals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expiratory-gated taVNS adds no vmHRV benefit during slow breathing; leaves open whether other parameters or pairings may enhance vagal tone.
As cardiac vagal control is a hallmark of good health and self-regulatory capacity, researchers are seeking ways to increase vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) in an accessible and non-invasive way. Findings with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) have been disappointing in this respect, as its effects on vmHRV are inconsistent at best. It has been speculated that combining taVNS with other established ways to increase vmHRV may produce synergistic effects. To test this idea, the present study combined taVNS with slow breathing in a cross-over design. A total of 22 participants took part in two sessions of breathing at 6 breaths/min: once combined with taVNS, and once combined with sham stimulation. Electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 400 µs) was applied during expiration, either to the tragus and cavum conchae (taVNS) or to the earlobe (sham). ECG was recorded during baseline, 20-minutes of stimulation, and the recovery period. Frequentist and Bayesian analyses showed no effect of taVNS (in comparison to sham stimulation) on the root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats, mean inter-beat interval, or spectral power of heart rate variability at a breathing frequency of 0.1 Hz. These findings suggest that expiratory-gated taVNS combined with the stimulation parameters examined here does not produce acute effects on vmHRV during slow breathing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szulczewski et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=22). Expiratory-gated Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) vs. Sham stimulation (earlobe) was evaluated on Vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) measured by root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) (p=0.38). Expiratory-gated transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) combined with slow breathing at 0.1 Hz did not further augment vagally mediated heart rate variability compared to slow breathing with sham stimulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: