No AccessJournal of Urology1 Mar 1961Retropubic Prostatectomy, 1947-1960: A Critical Evaluation David B. Stearns David B. StearnsDavid B. Stearns More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65333-3AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1961 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByFirfer R, Berkson B, Lipshitz S and Hsieh W (2018) The Combined ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 132, NO. 4, (687-689), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1984.Salvatierra O, Rigdon W and Malley J (2018) Modified Retropubic Prostatectomy: A New TechniqueJournal of Urology, VOL. 108, NO. 1, (126-130), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1972.Beck A and Gaudin H (2018) The Hryntschak Prostatectomy. I. A Review of 1,346 CaseJournal of Urology, VOL. 103, NO. 5, (637-640), Online publication date: 1-May-1970.Beck A (2018) The Hryntschak Prostatectomy: II. A Late Review of 179 CasesJournal of Urology, VOL. 103, NO. 6, (778-782), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1970.Sakati I and Marshall V (2018) Postoperative Fatalities in UrologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 95, NO. 3, (412-420), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1966.Riba L, Apfelbach G and Uehling D (2018) Vesicocapsular Prostatectomy and Elective Intrapelvic Hernial RepairJournal of Urology, VOL. 90, NO. 1, (75-79), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1963.Presman D and Rolnick D (2018) Retropubic Prostatectomy: Mortality, Complications and Functional End ResultsJournal of Urology, VOL. 88, NO. 6, (814-821), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1962. Volume 85Issue 3March 1961Page: 322-328 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1961 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information David B. Stearns More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David B. Stearns (1961) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: