Why the study?
Does the apoA-I[Lys107del] variant increase binding to TG-rich particles compared to WT apoA-I?
Does the apoA-I[Lys107del] variant increase binding to TG-rich particles compared to WT apoA-I?
The structural changes in the apoA-I[Lys107del] variant facilitate its binding to TG-rich lipoproteins, which may reduce their lipolysis and contribute to hypertriglyceridemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May promote hypertriglyceridemia by impairing TG-rich lipoprotein lipolysis; leaves open clinical relevance in variant carriers pending human studies.
We found earlier that apoA-I variants that induced hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) in mice had increased affinity to TG-rich lipoproteins and thereby impaired their catabolism. Here, we tested whether a naturally occurring human apoA-I mutation, Lys107del, associated with HTG also promotes apoA-I binding to TG-rich particles. We expressed apoA-I[Lys107del] variant in Escherichia coli, studied its binding to TG-rich emulsion particles, and performed a physicochemical characterization of the protein. Compared with WT apoA-I, apoA-I[Lys107del] showed enhanced binding to TG-rich particles, lower stability, and greater exposure of hydrophobic surfaces. The crystal structure of truncated, Δ(185-243), apoA-I suggests that deletion of Lys107 disrupts helix registration and disturbs a stabilizing salt bridge network in the N-terminal helical bundle. To elucidate the structural changes responsible for the altered function of apoA-I[Lys107del], we studied another mutant, apoA-I [Lys107Ala]. Our findings suggest that the registry shift and ensuing disruption of the inter-helical salt bridges in apoA-I[Lys107del] result in destabilization of the helical bundle structure and greater exposure of hydrophobic surfaces. We conclude that the structural changes in the apoA-I[Lys107del] variant facilitate its binding to TG-rich lipoproteins and thus, may reduce their lipolysis and contribute to the development of HTG in carriers of the mutation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorshkova et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: