Key result
Bed-integrated ballistocardiography had similar nighttime beat-to-beat interval error in patients vs healthy subjects (11.0 vs 12.7 ms), but temporal coverage was lower (39.3% vs 73.2%).
Why the study?
Bed-integrated ballistocardiography (BCG) has potential for unobtrusive monitoring of patients in general hospital wards, but has mainly gained interest in the wellness domain.
Does bed-integrated ballistocardiography accurately estimate beat-to-beat heart rate compared to ECG in hospitalized patients after vascular intervention?
Observational (n=24)
Does bed-integrated ballistocardiography accurately estimate beat-to-beat heart rate compared to ECG in hospitalized patients after vascular intervention?
Bed-integrated ballistocardiography can accurately estimate beat-to-beat heart rate at night in hospitalized patients, though with lower temporal coverage than in healthy subjects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BCG enables accurate nighttime BBI estimation in post-vascular patients; leaves open validation in larger cohorts before clinical adoption.
While bed-integrated ballistocardiography (BCG) has potential clinical applications such as unobtrusive monitoring of patients staying in the general hospital ward, it has so far mainly gained interest in the wellness domain. In this article, the potential of BCG to monitor hospitalized patients after surgical intervention was assessed. Long-term BCG recordings (mean duration 17.7 h) of 14 patients were performed with an EMFit QS bed sensor. In addition, ten healthy subjects were recorded during sleep (mean duration 7.8 h). Using an iterative algorithm, beat-to-beat intervals (BBIs) and the ultra-short-term heart-rate-variability (HRV) parameters standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were estimated and compared to an ECG reference in terms of average estimation error and temporal coverage. While the absolute BBI estimation error was found to be higher when full-day patient data was used (16.5 ms), no significant difference between healthy subjects (12.7 ms) and patient nighttime data (11.0 ms) was observed. Nevertheless, temporal coverage of BBI estimation was significantly lower in patients (39.3% overall, 51.7% at night) compared to the healthy sleepers (73.2%). This resulted in reduced HRV estimation coverage (9.7% vs. 37.2%) at comparable estimation error levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antink et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Hospitalized patients after vascular intervention (n=24). Bed-integrated ballistocardiography (BCG) vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Temporal coverage of beat-to-beat interval (BBI) estimation. Bed-integrated ballistocardiography had similar nighttime beat-to-beat interval error in patients vs healthy subjects (11.0 vs 12.7 ms), but temporal coverage was lower (39.3% vs 73.2%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: