Summary A procedure is presented for designing a fracture treatment when little or no information is available. This procedure is based on fluid efficiency, which is defined as the fracture volume divided by the injected fluid volume. The fluid efficiency for a treatment was found to determine the pad size and optimum proppant schedule completely without any assumption of the appropriate fracture-geometry model or associated parameters. The efficiency was also found to determine the fluid's exposure time to temperature. This determination requires an assumption for the portion of the fracture face that is cooled during a treatment. The exposure is important for defining the fluid additives of relatively large and high-temperature treatments. The fluid efficiency can be determined from a pressure-decline analysis for a calibration treatment performed before the actual stimulation treatment. In addition, if the appropriate geometry model is assumed, the decline analysis of the calibration treatment provides inferred values of fluid-loss coefficient and fracture width and penetration. Also, for the case when the calibration treatment is smaller than the actual stimulation, analyses are presented for predicting the relative change in efficiency, width, and penetration for the treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K. G. Nolte (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: