Why the study?
Does preoperative platelet function assessment using the cone and plate(let) analyzer predict postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does preoperative platelet function assessment using the cone and plate(let) analyzer predict postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Preoperative platelet function evaluated by the cone and plate(let) analyzer is an independent predictor of postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery patients.
May flag bleeding risk via cone and plate(let) analyzer in cardiac surgery; leaves open whether testing should guide management.
The cone and plate(let) analyzer is an established method for assessing platelet function. It evaluates adherence of platelets on an extracellular matrix, expressed as a percentage of surface coverage and the average size of the aggregates. The purpose of this study was to determine the applicability of the cone and plate(let) analyzer in monitoring platelet function and predicting postoperative bleeding. The relationship between postoperative bleeding, perioperative platelet function, and other parameters was studied. A significant decrease in surface coverage was detected upon establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (from 6.9% +/- 3.9% to 4.7% +/- 1.7%) with a return to preoperative values at the end of surgery. Preoperative average size and surface coverage were the only parameters that significantly and linearly correlated with postoperative bleeding. Patients with an aggregate average size < 20 microm(2) had a significantly higher incidence of severe bleeding (> 965 mL) than those with a size > 20 microm(2) (44% vs. 0%), and a higher mean blood loss (908 +/- 322 mL vs. 337 +/- 78 mL). Similar results were obtained for surface coverage < 5%, indicating the predictive value of these parameters. Preoperative platelet function as evaluated by the cone and plate(let) analyzer is an independent risk factor determining postoperative bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerrah et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: