Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A detailed experimental and computational study of the absorption and fluorescence spectra of 5-aminouracil (5 AU) and 6-aminouracil (6 AU) in aqueous solution is reported. The lowest energy band of the steady-state absorption spectra of 5 AU is considerably red-shifted, noticeably less intense, and broader than its counterpart in uracil (U). On the contrary, the 6 AU lowest energy absorption peak is close in energy to that of U, but it is much narrower and the transition is much more intense. The emission properties of 5 AU, 6 AU, and U are also very different. Both amino-substituted compounds exhibit indeed a much larger Stokes shift as compared to U, and the emission band of 5 AU is much narrower than that of 6 AU. Those features are fully rationalized with the help of PCM/TD-PBE0 calculations in aqueous solution and MS-CASPT2/CASSCF calculations in the gas phase. A stable minimum on the potential energy surface of the lowest energy bright state is found for 5 AU, both in the gas phase and in aqueous solution. For 6 AU a barrierless path leads to the conical intersection with the ground electronic state, but a nonplanar plateau region is predicted in aqueous solution, which is responsible for the very large Stokes shift. Some general considerations on the excited-state dynamics of uracil derivatives are also reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bányász et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: