Corporate Governance (CG) has assumed greater limelight with the series of corporate failings, following whichthe markets, investors and society at large have begun to loose faith in the infallibility of these systems.Nowadays, the conduct of those who take care of ‘public’ money is being questioned since they are being testedon ‘ethical’ standards. We have advocated an application of ‘Dharma’, as stipulated in ancient Indian ‘Shastras,’to improve CG. Progressive firms in India have voluntarily put in place systems of good CG and are applyingsome of the ethical values derived from Shashtras.Asia is a diverse region and improving CG has been on the agenda for their regulators, with most markets havingintroduced comprehensive regulations. We have provided an overview of two global studies conducted by theACGA and JP Morgan. No doubt, CG scenario has improved to some extent in the Asian region and somemarkets have made significant progress, the ethos of CG has yet to sink in. Several Asian markets haveindividually established their own national codes to address their special requirements. We believe thatmaintaining the momentum for CG reforms in Asian markets will require some rethinking on basic questions.Thus, CG in Asia remains, at best, a work-in-progress requiring some rethinking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madan Lal Bhasin (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: