Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article investigates the potential benefits of dynamic Frequency Restoration Reserve (FRR) allocation and dimensioning in a multi-area context, focusing on the Nordic Load-Frequency Control block. Emphasis is placed on how the available information impacts the FRR dimensioning. To assess the potential benefits, a model for multi-area FRR dimensioning is proposed, applicable to both static and dynamic dimensioning approaches. The proposed FRR dimensioning model includes a new application of a methodology to simulate imbalance scenarios and sequentially dimensions FRR capacity for reference incidents and normal imbalances. The main benefit of dynamic FRR dimensioning is that the need for FRR capacity is continuously updated according to the expected short-term operating conditions, such that the daily reliability level is always close to the desired reliability level. Case study results show that dynamic FRR dimensioning can lead to a reduction in total reserve needs compared to a static approach. This reduction is significantly larger if FRR is dimensioned after the clearing of the day-ahead market. • A new model applicable for static and dynamic FRR dimensioning. • Impact of information availability on FRR dimensioning is investigated. • Dynamic dimensioning improves the daily reliability levels. • Dynamic dimensioning reduces the need for upward FRR capacity. • Reserve re-allocation reduces the transmission network usage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khodadadi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: