Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nonspecific bioactivity and assay artifacts have gained increasing attention in recent years. This focus has arisen primarily from the publication of a set of chemical substructures, termed pan assay interference compounds (PAINS), which are associated with promiscuous bioactivity and assay interference in real and virtual high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns. Despite an increasing awareness in the HTS and medicinal chemistry communities about the liabilities of these compounds, articles featuring PAINS and PAINS-like compounds are still being published. In this perspective, we describe some of the factors we believe are driving this resource-sapping trend. We also provide what we hope are helpful insights that may lead to the earlier recognition of these generally nontranslatable compounds, thus preventing the propagation of PAINS-full costly research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahlin et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: