Why the study?
Does intramyocardial troponin-T monitoring with microdialysis provide more detailed information on myocardial metabolism than peripheral blood monitoring in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Does intramyocardial troponin-T monitoring with microdialysis provide more detailed information on myocardial metabolism than peripheral blood monitoring in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery?
Intramyocardial microdialysis provides superior temporal resolution of troponin-T release compared to peripheral blood sampling during coronary artery bypass surgery.
May support microdialysis for finer troponin resolution in CABG; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the time course of troponin-T release into the extracellular fluid of the myocardium and to distinguish between a rise in troponin-T due to implantation trauma and an increase due to cardiac arrest during coronary surgery. DESIGN: Microdialysis probes were implanted in the heart of seven patients soon after sternotomy. Troponin-T was measured in the microdialysates and in peripheral blood from 3 h before to 24 h after heart arrest. RESULTS: The troponin-T concentration in the microdialysates increased immediately after probe implantation and decreased to baseline within 70 min. This early peak is interpreted to reflect a local trauma. Three hours after cross-clamp release, a second peak of microdialysate troponin-T was recorded; 50 times higher than in serum. Eight to 24 h later a third peak occurred in five patients. Serum troponin-T was below the detection level at the beginning of the operation but increased linearly during the first 3 h of reperfusion and remained at that level thereafter. CONCLUSION: Microdialysis is a safe technique providing more information on myocardial metabolism during and after bypass surgery than can be obtained from peripheral blood. The release of troponin-T in response to cardiac arrest can be distinguished in time from the local tissue response to probe implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mantovani et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: