Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Plant growth is plastic and adaptive to the light environment; characteristics such as extension growth, architecture, and leaf morphology change, depending on the light spectrum. Although blue (B; 400–500 nm) and red (R; 600–700 nm) light are generally considered the most efficient wavelengths for eliciting photosynthesis, both are often required for relatively normal growth. Our objective was to quantify how the B:R influenced plant seedling growth and morphology and understand how plants acclimated to these light environments. We grew seedlings of three ornamental annuals and tomato under six sole-source light-emitting diode (LED) lighting treatments or one cool-white fluorescent treatment that each delivered a photosynthetic photon flux ( PPF ) of 160 µmol·m −2 ·s –1 for 18 h·d −1 . The following treatments were provided with B (peak = 446 nm) and R (peaks = 634 and 664 nm) LEDs: B 160 (160 µmol·m −2 ·s −1 of B light only), B 80 +R 80 , B 40 +R 120 , B 20 +R 140 , B 10 +R 150 , and R 160 . Seedlings of impatiens ( Impatiens walleriana ), salvia ( Salvia splendens ), petunia ( Petunia ×hybrida ), and tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) were grown for 31 to 37 days at a constant 20 °C. Plants with as little as 10 µmol·m −2 ·s −1 of B light were 23% to 50% shorter and had 17% to 50% smaller leaves than plants under only R light. Impatiens and salvia had 53% to 98% greater fresh shoot weight under treatments without B light than with ≥80 µmol·m −2 ·s −1 . Plants grown under fluorescent lamps had the greatest chlorophyll content but also had among the thinnest leaves of treatments. Blue-rich light increased flowering in impatiens and reduced incidence of intumescences on tomato. We conclude that, in sole-source lighting of propagules, B light inhibits leaf and stem expansion, which subsequently limits photon capture and constrains biomass accumulation. As little as 10 µmol·m −2 ·s −1 of B light in an R-dominant background can elicit desirable growth responses for the production of young plants and for other situations in which compact growth is desired.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wollaeger et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: