Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors, pharmacologically distinct proteins, have been reported to be structurally dissimilar. In the present study three techniques were employed to compare the nature of mammalian beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors. Antibodies against each of the receptor subtypes were raised separately. Polyclonal antisera against beta 1-receptors of rat fat cells were raised in mice, and antisera against beta 2-receptors of guinea pig lung were raised in rabbits. Receptors purified from rat fat cells (beta 1-), S49 mouse lymphoma cells (beta 2-), and rat liver (beta 2-) were probed with these antisera. Each anti-receptor antisera demonstrated the ability to immunoprecipitate purified receptors of both beta 1- and beta 2- subtypes. The mobility of beta-receptors subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was probed using antireceptor antibodies and nitrocellulose blots of the gels. Fat cell beta 1-adrenergic receptors display Mr = 67,000 under reducing conditions and Mr = 54,000 under nonreducing conditions, as previously reported (Moxham, C. P., and Malbon, C. C. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 6072-6077). Both beta 1- and beta 2-receptors displayed this same shift in electrophoretic mobility observed in the presence as compared to the absence of disulfide bridge-reducing agents, as detected both by autoradiography of the radiolabeled receptors and by immunoblotting of native receptors. Finally, isoelectric focusing of purified radioiodinated beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors revealed identical isoelectric points. These data are the first to provide analyses of immunological, structural, and biochemical features of beta 1- and beta 2-subtypes in tandem and underscore the structural similarities that exist between these pharmacologically distinct receptors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moxham et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: