Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Xixian Ke 1 , Yue Yuan 1 , Chenglin Guo 2 , Yan Yang 1 , Qiang Pu 2 , Xueting Hu 1 , Kui Tang 1 , Xinmei Luo 1 , Qianqian Jiang 1 , Xiaolan Su 1 , Lunxu Liu 2 , Wen Zhu 1 , Yuquan Wei 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center/National Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China Correspondence to: Wen Zhu, email: zhuwen@scu.edu.cn Lunxu Liu, email: lunxu_liu@aliyun.com Keywords: miR-410, stemness, Wnt/β-catenin, non-small cells lung cancer Received: June 06, 2016 Accepted: December 27, 2016 Published: January 05, 2017 ABSTRACT Our previous research indicated miR-410 played a critical role in promoting the tumorigenesis and development of NSCLC (non-small cells lung cancer). MiR-410 has been recently reported to be crucial for development and differentiation of embryonic stem cells. But it remains elusive whether miR-410 stimulates the stemness of cancer until now. Herein, we identify miR-410 induces the stemness and is associated with the progression of NSCLC. We demonstrate miR-410 increases the levels of stem cells marker Sox2, Oct4, Nanog, CXCR4 as well as lung cancer stem cells surface marker CD44 and CD166. MiR-410 promotes stem cells-like properties such as proliferation, sphere formation, metastasis and chemoresistance. Moreover, Gsk3β is directly targeted and post-transcriptionally downregulated by miR-410. Also, the expression levels of miR-410 and Gsk3β may be correlated to clinicopathological differentiation in NSCLC tumor specimens. Additionally, we demonstrate miR-410 induces stemness through inhibiting Gsk3β but increasing Sox2, Oct4, Nanog and CXCR4, which binds to β-catenin signaling. In conclusion, our findings identify the miR-410/Gsk3β/β-catenin signaling axis is a novel molecular circuit in inducing stemness of NSCLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: