Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The existence of three phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors has resulted in an increase in the marketing of the drugs. This has led to a shift in focus from scientifically rigorous endpoints such as efficacy and adverse event profiles to patient preference. RECENT FINDINGS: Although no consensus currently exists as to the correct methodology for preference studies, some basic guidelines should be adhered to, including: (1) the double-blinding of drug administration; (2) non-biased drug administration instructions; (3) an adequately conducted crossover study; (4) comparison of equivalent doses; (5) standardized preference assessment; (6) declaration of patient demographics; and (7) rigorous statistical analysis. These factors are discussed in the light of the three published preference studies. SUMMARY: In the final analysis, it is unclear to this author how preference studies impact upon clinician decision-making when confronted by a patient with erectile dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John P. Mulhall (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: