Following Mandelstam's suggestion, we consider a potential which can be expanded in a power series in r, beginning with 1/r. Then at large energy (positive or negative) there will be Regge poles at all negative integral values of l. If the 1/r term is absent in the expansion of the potential, the pole at l=-1 will be absent. Generally, if r^2n-1 is the first nonvanishing odd power term in the potential expansion, the poles at -1, -2, ⋯, -n are absent. If the potential expansion contains only even non-negative powers of r, there will be no Regge poles at finite negative l in the limit of large energy. If the potential behaves as -ar² at small r, the scattering amplitude has a cut in the l plane from -1/2-a1/2 to -1/2+a1/2, and the Regge poles are no longer located at negative integers at large energy. For finite energy, it is shown that a pole at a positive integer or half-integer l implies another pole at -l-1 but that the residues at these poles are, in general, different from each other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bethe et al. (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: