Why the study?
Endovascular aortic repair outcomes in octogenarians remain unclear, prompting investigation into whether results differ from younger patients in elective repair.
Does elective endovascular aortic repair have different early mortality rates in octogenarians compared to younger patients?
Does elective endovascular aortic repair have different early mortality rates in octogenarians compared to younger patients?
Elective endovascular aortic repair in octogenarians has comparable early mortality to younger patients, suggesting age alone should not be an exclusion criterion despite lower long-term survival.
Octogenarian EVAR decisions warrant comorbidity-weighted assessment; leaves open age-specific outcome differences in larger cohorts.
Introduction: Endovascular aortic repair outcomes in octogenarians remain unclear. We aim to investigate whether the results for octogenarians differ from those of the younger population in elective endovascular aortic repair. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to January 2022, 313 patients were treated with elective endovascular aortic repairs. Patient demographics and perioperative and postoperative features were obtained from the hospital database. The primary goals were to explore the early mortality rates of patients aged 80 years and older and compare them with those under 80. The secondary goal was to analyze the comorbid factors. Results: A total of 245 patients were under 80 years old, and 68 patients were 80 years and older. The early mortality rate was 2.94% in the octogenarians and 0.81% in the rest, and there was no significant difference between the two (p = 0.24). However, being 80 years and older led to a significantly lower survival probability at the five-year follow-ups. The American Society of Anesthesiologists’ score was found to help predict late mortality risk and patient selection for elective endovascular aortic repair. Conclusion: As octogenarians are fragile and sensitive to complications, patient selection, careful consideration of life expectancy, and clinical assessment are key to repair. Furthermore, age should not be an independent exclusion criterion in the endovascular aortic repair treatment decision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deniz et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: