Why the study?
Reduced heart rate increase, heart rate recovery, and higher resting heart rate are associated with cardiovascular disease, but causal inferences have not been deduced.
Do genetic variants associated with heart rate increase, heart rate recovery, and resting heart rate causally affect cardiovascular disease risk?
Do genetic variants associated with heart rate increase, heart rate recovery, and resting heart rate causally affect cardiovascular disease risk?
Mendelian randomization suggests resting heart rate has a causal effect on atrial fibrillation, but finds no strong evidence for causal effects of heart rate increase or recovery during exercise on cardiovascular outcomes.
Supports causal role of resting heart rate in atrial fibrillation; leaves open effects of exercise heart rate dynamics on cardiovascular outcomes.
Background Reduced heart rate (HR) increase (HRI), recovery (HRR), and higher resting HR are associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease, but causal inferences have not been deduced. We investigated causal effects of HRI, HRR, and resting HR on CV risk, all-cause mortality (ACM), atrial fibrillation (AF), coronary artery disease (CAD), and ischemic stroke (IS) using Mendelian Randomization. Methods 11 variants for HRI, 11 for HRR, and two sets of 46 and 414 variants for resting HR were obtained from four genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on UK Biobank. We performed a lookup on GWASs for CV risk and ACM in UK Biobank (N = 375,367, 5.4% cases and N = 393,165, 4.4% cases, respectively). For CAD, AF, and IS, we used publicly available summary statistics. We used a random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method and sensitivity analyses to estimate causality. Results IVW showed a nominally significant effect of HRI on CV events (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0012, P = 4.11 × 10–2) and on CAD and AF. Regarding HRR, IVW was not significant for any outcome. The IVW method indicated statistically significant associations of resting HR with AF (OR = 0.9825, P = 9.8 × 10–6), supported by all sensitivity analyses, and a nominally significant association with IS (OR = 0.9926, P = 9.82 × 10–3). Conclusion Our findings suggest no strong evidence of an association between HRI and HRR and any outcome and confirm prior work reporting a highly significant effect of resting HR on AF. Future research is required to explore HRI and HRR associations further using more powerful predictors, when available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mensah-Kane et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: