Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Urban tree planting initiatives are a popular way to increase municipal tree presence. Initiatives on private land, including backyard tree planting programs, are essential because most available planting space across cities is on private property. Therefore, understanding the success of these programs, including long-term tree retention rates, is crucial for determining future urban forest characteristics and associated ecosystem services. However, few studies evaluate the outcome of backyard planting programs, primarily because of barriers like limited organizational resources and the inaccessibility of trees planted in backyards. To address this issue, our study examined the feasibility of using publicly available aerial imagery to assess long-term retention of trees planted through a backyard tree planting program in Toronto, Ontario. Methods Using 20 years of leaf-off imagery and hand-drawn planting maps, a sample of 2,654 trees was assessed for feasibility of location digitization, presence-absence classification in 2022, and 5-year survivorship. Results We successfully digitized 1,865 (70%) of these trees, but the remaining 30% could not be mapped due to insufficient location information. Of those digitized, we could confidently determine if 1,533 trees (82%) were present or absent in 2022. The status of the remaining 18% of trees was unclear, often due to image obstruction or quality. We were able to determine presence/absence 5 years after planting for 81% of trees in the subset examined. Conclusions Ultimately, using aerial imagery could be a time- and cost-effective approach to long-term, ongoing urban tree monitoring, though challenges associated with image availability and quality should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conway et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: