Orthorhombic models are often used in the interpretation of azimuthally varying seismic signatures recorded over fractured reservoirs. Here, we develop an analytic framework for describing the attenuation coefficients in orthorhombic media with orthorhombic attenuation (i.e., the symmetry of both the real and imaginary parts of the stiffness tensor is identical) under the assumption of homogeneous wave propagation. The analogous form of the Christoffel equation in the symmetry planes of orthorhombic and VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) media helps to obtain the symmetry-plane attenuation coefficients by adapting the existing VTI equations. To take full advantage of this equivalence with transverse isotropy, we introduce a parameter set similar to the VTI attenuation-anisotropy parameters ϵQ, δQ, and γQ. This notation, based on the same principle as Tsvankin's velocity-anisotropy parameters for orthorhombic media, leads to concise linearized equations for thesymmetry-plane attenuation coefficients of all three modes (P, S1, and S2). The attenuation-anisotropy parameters also allow us to simplify the P-wave attenuation coefficient AP outside the symmetry planes under the assumptions of small attenuation and weak velocity and attenuation anisotropy. The approximate coefficient AP has the same form as the linearized P-wave phase-velocity function, with the velocity parameters ϵ(1,2) and δ(1,2,3) replaced by the attenuation parameters ϵQ(1,2) and δQ(1,2,3). The exact attenuation coefficient, however, also depends on the velocity-anisotropy parameters, while the body-wave velocities are almost unperturbed by the presence of attenuation. The reduction in the number of parameters responsible for the P-wave attenuation and the simple approximation for the coefficient AP provide a basis for inverting P-wave attenuation measurements from orthorhombic media. The attenuation processing must be preceded by anisotropic velocity analysis that can be performed (in the absence of pronounced velocity dispersion) using existing algorithms for nonattenuative media.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: