Why the study?
Does oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter correlate with ultrasound measurement and reflect vascular structure in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Does oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter correlate with ultrasound measurement and reflect vascular structure in patients with cardiovascular risk factors?
Oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter is an accurate alternative to ultrasound that correlates with atherosclerotic structural alterations of the vascular wall.
AIMS: with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID), an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the brachial artery and association of oscillometrically measured brachial artery diameter with ultrasonographically measured brachial artery diameter in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: and brachial artery diameter and ultrasound measurements of brachial artery diameter, FMD, NID, and IMT of the brachial artery were performed in 50 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: was significantly associated with brachial IMT (β=0.33, P=0.04). Oscillometric brachial artery diameter significantly correlated with ultrasound brachial artery diameter (r=0.79, P<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between oscillometric brachial artery diameter and ultrasound brachial artery diameter (mean difference, -0.17 mm; limits of agreement, -1.03 mm to 0.69 mm). CONCLUSIONS: may represent atherosclerotic structural alterations of the vascular wall but not vascular function. The accuracy of oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter is acceptable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maruhashi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: