The homopolymer of trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPA) was synthesized by suspension polymerization using a thermodynamically good solvent (toluene) as a porogen (vol. ratio 1:1). This polymer possesses a high specific surface area (437 m2 · g−1) and porosity (50%). It was found by sorption of benzene and cyclohexane that the majority of the pores are in the range of 1–5 nm. Sorption of phenol, a standard sorbate, from a water solution is proportional to the specific surface area of the mesopores. This sorption is higher than that of nonspecific sorbents (like styrene/divinylbenzene copolymers) and smaller than the sorption of specific ones (like acrylonitrile/divinylbenzene copolymers). Two sets of reactive copolymers were obtained. In the first set, TMPA (20–40 vol.‐%) was polymerized with acrylonitrile (AN) in the presence of a constant amount of toluene as an inert diluent (vol. ratio 1:1). In the second set of copolymers the cross‐linking degree was kept constant (30 or 40 vol.‐% of TMPA) but various solvent mixtures were used, namely: toluene/tetradecane or hexadecane, toluene/2‐ethylhexanol, cyclohexanol/tetradecane or hexadecane, cyclohexanol/2‐ethylhexanol (vol. ratio 9:1). It was found that all the copolymers are macroporous (volume of pores approx. 1,0 cm3 · g−1) but those obtained in the presence of good solvents display a higher specific surface area and hence better sorption properties towards phenol than those obtained in the presence of poor solvents. The swelling of AN/TMPA copolymers is smaller than that of the TMPA homopolymer due to the presence of additional physical crosslinks formed by the strongly polar nitrile groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolarz et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: