Why the study?
Do Vernakalant and Flecainide alter the electrophysiological and hemodynamic benefits of biventricular pacing in a canine model of LBBB?
Do Vernakalant and Flecainide alter the electrophysiological and hemodynamic benefits of biventricular pacing in a canine model of LBBB?
Vernakalant and Flecainide decrease contractility and slow conduction but do not alter the relative electrical and hemodynamic benefits of biventricular pacing in a canine model of LBBB.
Does not blunt relative BiVP benefits in this canine LBBB model; leaves open translation to human CRT patients.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) are frequently treated with biventricular pacing (BiVP). Approximately one-third of them suffer from atrial fibrillation. Pharmacological conversion of atrial fibrillation is performed with drugs that slow ventricular conduction, but the effects of these drugs on the benefit of BiVP are poorly understood. METHODS: Experiments were performed in dogs with chronic LBBB, investigating the effects of Vernakalant and Flecainide (n = 6 each) on hemodynamics and electrophysiology during epicardial (EPI) and endocardial BiVP. The degree of dyssynchrony and conduction slowing was quantified using QRS width and EPI electrical mapping. RESULTS: Compared with LBBB, EPI and endocardial BiVP reduced QRS duration by 7% ± 9% (P < 0.05 compared with LBBB) and 20% ± 13% (P < 0.05 compared with LBBB, P < 0.05 between modes), respectively. During BiVP, the administration of Vernakalant and Flecainide increased QRS duration by 20% ± 14% (P < 0.05 compared with predrug BiVP) and 34% ± 10% (P < 0.05 compared with predrug BiVP, P < 0.05 between drugs). left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax decreased by 16% ± 8% (P < 0.05 compared with predrug BiVP) during Vernakalant and by 14% ± 15% (P < 0.05 compared with predrug BiVP) during Flecainide. The drugs did not affect the relative changes in QRS width and LV dP/dtmax induced by BiVP. CONCLUSIONS: Vernakalant and Flecainide decrease contractility, slow myocardial conduction velocity, and increase activation time. The electrical and hemodynamic benefits of BiVP are not altered by the drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Middendorp et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: