BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) induces immune tolerance to hymenoptera venom antigens in allergic patients and is therefore a helpful model for studying modulation of allergic immune response. The objectives were to assess the early effects of ultra-rush VIT on T lymphocyte activation and regulatory profile induction, in all subjects combined and according to the four severity grades of the Mueller classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples from 30 vespid-allergic patients were taken before and after the first day of treatment, and before day 15 and day 45 booster injections. IFN-gamma and IL-4 levels were assayed by ELISA, in whole-blood supernatants. IFN-gamma and IL-13-producing T cells, but also natural CD4+CD25+high regulatory T cells and acquired regulatory T cell proportions were assessed by flow cytometry. Results were analysed in the whole population and compared between patients with I-II or III-IV allergic reactions. RESULTS: During VIT, IFN-gamma increased in whole blood when IL-4 decreased. Among T cells, the percentage of CD3+IFN-gamma+ cells increased while IL-13-producing T cells decreased. Proportions of CD4+CD25+high cells and IL-10-producing T cells increased with VIT. In I-II subjects, IFN-gamma increased gradually, whereas it remained at low levels in III-IV patients. By contrast, IL-4 decrease was more pronounced in III-IV patients. Increase in CD4+CD25+high T cells occurred early in I-II patients but was delayed in III-IV patients. IL-10-producing T cells increased gradually in both groups but were in a lower proportion in III-IV patients. CONCLUSION: A T helper type 2 (Th2)-to-Th1 switch occurs during ultra-rush VIT, in parallel with natural and acquired regulatory T cell increase. These events occur earlier and at a higher level in less severe subjects, suggesting that VIT tolerance induction is easier to achieve in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mamessier et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: