Naval ratings read typescript aloud through a window whose speed and size varied systematically in different trials. Eye movements were recorded electrically. Errors increased significantly as the window was reduced from a full line to five words, probably as a result of the tighter pacing and reduced peripheral vision. Regressions were unaffected. This is a serious criticism of reading films using windows to ‘improve’ the reading of adults. Errors rose steeply to 40% as the time for which letters were exposed fell from 0·3 to 0·2 sec.; fixations did not increase in frequency. Thus in reading the visual system behaves like a single‐shot camera firing at not more than about five times per second.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. C. Poulton (1962) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: