Bacterial contamination of dialysis fluids can cause inflammation and pyrogenic reactions in patients. Bacteria can grow more rapidly in dialysis fluids than in the high quality water used for their preparation, because dialysis fluids contain nutrients and electrolytes. Rapid determination of the microbiological quality of dialysis fluids is important, as it may aid in the reduction of instances of endotoxaemia. Microbiological contamination in dialysis systems should be detected as quickly as possible in order to provide dialysis fluid to patients with safety. Microbial contamination in dialysis fluids is usually assessed by culture-dependent methods such as plate counting. Arvanitidou et al. [1] examined dialysis fluids collected from 85 haemodialysis centres in Greece and found a total of 3500 ± 5000 colony-forming units (CFUs)/ml of heterotrophic bacteria in 40% of measured samples [1]. Oie et al. [2] reported that dialysis fluids are more frequently contaminated than the water, acid or bicarbonate concentrates used for dialysis fluid preparation, and that the bacterial count in 42.5% of 40 dialysis fluid samples was >2000 CFU/ml. These data indicate that the microbial contamination levels in a considerable proportion of dialysis fluid samples are relatively high. However, culture-dependent methods often underestimate bacterial numbers, because many bacterial species such as mycobacteria cannot be cultivated by conventional means [3], thus potentially placing the patients at a higher risk of inflammation and pyrogenic reactions. In addition, plate counting can require up to several days to detect bacteria. Therefore, microbiological qualities of dialysis fluids are often evaluated by measuring the endotoxin level. The endotoxin assays are simple and require a few hours to obtain results. However, endotoxin levels are often not correlated with numbers of CFU, and high numbers of colony-forming cells are sometimes detected in dialysis fluids with significantly low endotoxin level [4]. Simple, rapid and accurate methods of enumeration without long-time (e.g. 7 days) culture are essential, in order to maintain microbiological quality of dialysis fluids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: