Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrofit prioritization can be guided by various metrics (e.g., monetary, network performance). However, community resilience champions holistic community improvement by reducing post-disaster impacts relative to network and community social operation. Few prioritization approaches have been developed to accommodate both performance-based and social impact-based perspectives. This work introduces a network retrofit prioritization approach integrating an optimization-based approach driven by network performance and a social impact-based criticality. The proposed socially-aware retrofit prioritization approach is implemented for Seaside, Oregon’s electric power distribution network exposed to tsunami-earthquake hazards across budgetary levels. Prioritization variation is compared across scenarios and with both original optimization-based and social impact criticality-based prioritizations. The implementation demonstrates the socially-aware prioritization successfully integrates the two prioritizations and performs at an intermediate level relative to the two original approaches. The socially-aware retrofit prioritization approach marks a pivotal point for informed decision-making whereby multiple decision perspectives are combined to better support community resilience-based decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beck et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: