Language has been given a largely structural definition by linguistics, but in order to have a psyclhological theory of language, the struc- tural emphasis must be replaced by a func- tional one. What must an organism do in or- der to give evidence that it has language? More specifically, when is a response a word? A se- quence of responses a sentence? What makes one response sequence an assertion or predication, another an imperative, still another a question? In this paper I try to give these questions the most general answers possible, general in the sense of relieving them of their exclusively human form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Premack (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: