Nucleotides ATP and AMP bind to the isolated C-terminus of ClC-5, increasing its thermal stability without altering secondary structure, providing direct biochemical evidence for nucleotide interaction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nucleotide binding to ClC-5 C-terminus may modulate channel activity; leaves open its physiological or disease relevance.
Mutations in ClC-5 (chloride channel 5), a member of the ClC family of chloride ion channels and antiporters, have been linked to Dent's disease, a renal disease associated with proteinuria. Several of the disease-causing mutations are premature stop mutations which lead to truncation of the C-terminus, pointing to the functional significance of this region. The C-terminus of ClC-5, like that of other eukaryotic ClC proteins, is cytoplasmic and contains a pair of CBS (cystathionine beta-synthase) domains connected by an intervening sequence. The presence of CBS domains implies a regulatory role for nucleotide interaction based on studies of other unrelated proteins bearing these domains [Ignoul and Eggermont (2005) Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 289, C1369-C1378; Scott, Hawley, Green, Anis, Stewart, Scullion, Norman and Hardie (2004) J. Clin. Invest. 113, 274-284]. However, to date, there has been no direct biochemical or biophysical evidence to support nucleotide interaction with ClC-5. In the present study, we have expressed and purified milligram quantities of the isolated C-terminus of ClC-5 (CIC-5 Ct). CD studies show that the protein is compact, with predominantly alpha-helical structure. We determined, using radiolabelled ATP, that this nucleotide binds the folded protein with low affinity, in the millimolar range, and that this interaction can be competed with 1 muM AMP. CD studies show that binding of these nucleotides causes no significant change in secondary structure, consistent with a model wherein these nucleotides bind to a preformed site. However, both nucleotides induce an increase in thermal stability of ClC-5 Ct, supporting the suggestion that both nucleotides interact with and modify the biophysical properties of this protein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wellhauser et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: