Authors
We examined the impact of dynamical processes on spatial variability in ozone (O 3 ) mixing ratios at closely spaced air monitoring sites in southern New Hampshire (NH) during two O 3 episodes, July 21–25 and August 2, 2001. The Meso‐scale Meteorological Model (MM5) and the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) photochemical model were applied together with ground‐based atmospheric chemistry observations conducted by the Atmospheric Investigation, Regional Modeling, Analysis and Prediction (AIRMAP) program at the University of New Hampshire. Observations and model simulations suggested that during the July episode long‐range transport via the nocturnal low‐level jet (LLJ) played an important role in producing elevated daytime mixing ratios of O 3 . The marine site Isle of Shoals experienced the highest level of O 3 , possibly a result of having more diverse upwind sources and less ventilation compared to continental sites. Our model results suggest that during daytime the shallow sea breeze circulation contributes to high levels of O 3 at coastal and marine sites while the channeling effect of the Appalachian Mountains influences inland locations. In contrast to the July event, the event on August 2 was characterized by weak and transient synoptic flows, indicating insufficient time for transport of O 3 and its precursors from distant sources to inland sites in NH. Backward trajectories for both events showed that O 3 ‐rich air masses from the Boston metropolitan area can contribute to the high levels of O 3 (>120 ppbv) at coastal and marine sites in southern NH. Our results suggest that the International Consortium of Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT), an international field campaign based in the northeastern United States in summer 2004, should coordinate mobile platforms to investigate the vertical structure and chemical composition of the LLJ, the sea breeze, and the terrain‐forced flows, and estimate the influx of O 3 and its precursors to central New England.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: