Why the study?
Manual calculation and selection of time-series features from large temporal datasets are time-consuming, while accurate stress monitoring requires informative, distinguishable, and interpretable features.
Correlation-based time-series feature selection significantly improves the accuracy of stress classification models using heart rate and respiratory rate signals compared to conventional statistical features.
May advance wearable-based stress monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Time-series features are the characteristics of data periodically collected over time. The calculation of time-series features helps in understanding the underlying patterns and structure of the data, as well as in visualizing the data. The manual calculation and selection of time-series feature from a large temporal dataset are time-consuming. It requires researchers to consider several signal-processing algorithms and time-series analysis methods to identify and extract meaningful features from the given time-series data. These features are the core of a machine learning-based predictive model and are designed to describe the informative characteristics of the time-series signal. For accurate stress monitoring, it is essential that these features are not only informative but also well-distinguishable and interpretable by the classification models. Recently, a lot of work has been carried out on automating the extraction and selection of times-series features. In this paper, a correlation-based time-series feature selection algorithm is proposed and evaluated on the stress-predict dataset. The algorithm calculates a list of 1578 features of heart rate and respiratory rate signals (combined) using the tsfresh library. These features are then shortlisted to the more specific time-series features using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Pearson, Kendall, and Spearman correlation ranking techniques. A comparative study of conventional statistical features (like, mean, standard deviation, median, and mean absolute deviation) versus correlation-based selected features is performed using linear (logistic regression), ensemble (random forest), and clustering (k-nearest neighbours) predictive models. The correlation-based selected features achieved higher classification performance with an accuracy of 98.6% as compared to the conventional statistical feature’s 67.4%. The outcome of the proposed study suggests that it is vital to have better analytical features rather than conventional statistical features for accurate stress classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iqbal et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: