Bridged bicyclic sulfide 1 was originally found to provide high levels of asymmetric induction in sulfur ylide-mediated epoxidations. This sulfide possesses chirality in the [2.2.1] thioether moiety and the [2.2.1] camphor-derived carbocyclic moiety. To determine whether the optimal sulfide had been used, a diastereomer of sulfide 1 in which the stereochemistry of the [2.2.1] carbocycle was reversed (sulfide 5) was prepared and studied as an epoxidation catalyst. This diastereomer gave considerably lower levels of asymmetric induction than the original sulfide 1. From computational and x-ray studies it was found that sulfide 5 gave rise to a more hindered ylide, which reacted more reversibly with aldehydes leading to lower enantioselectivity. Conditions that reduced reversibility were also tested and high enantioselectivities were returned for sulfide 5 (similar to sulfide 1). The implications for the synthesis of chiral sulfides for asymmetric epoxidations are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aggarwal et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: