From 203 cases of low-frequency complaints a random selection of twenty-one cases were investigated. The main aim was to answer the question whether the annoyance is caused by an external physical sound or by a perceived but physically non-existing sound, i.e. low-frequency tinnitus. Noise recordings were made in the homes of the complainants, and the complainants were exposed to these in blind test listening experiments. Furthermore, the low-frequency hearing function of the complainants was investigated, and characteristics of the annoying sound were matched. The results showed that some of the complainants are annoyed by a physical sound (20–180 Hz), while others suffer from low-frequency tinnitus (perceived frequency 40–100 Hz). Physical sound at frequencies below 20 Hz (infrasound) is not responsible for the annoyance -or at all audible – in any of the investigated cases, and none of the complainants has extraordinary hearing sensitivity at low frequencies. For comparable cases of low-frequency noise complaints in general, it is anticipated that physical sound is responsible in a substantial part of the cases, while low-frequency tinnitus is responsible in another substantial part of the cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: