In order to study the relationships of aspartic proteases, we have modified pepsin, a single-chain eukaryotic enzyme, to a two-chain heterodimer, which resembles aspartic proteases from retrovirus, including human immunodeficiency virus. Two fragments of pepsinogen, residues 1P-172 and 173-326, were expressed separately in Escherichia coli. Mixtures of chains were refolded from urea solutions to generate an active two-chain pepsinogen, which was converted to two-chain pepsin in acid solutions. The intramolecular and bimolecular activation constants (k1 and k2) of two-chain pepsinogen are about 1.5-fold and one-sixth, respectively, of those for pepsinogen. Structural evidence suggests that the faster k1 of two-chain pepsinogen is due to decreased interaction of the propeptide with the pepsin moiety, implying that the rate-limiting step in the intramolecular activation of pepsinogen is the "conformational dissociation" of its propeptide. Two-chain pepsin has the same Km but only one-sixth of the kcat of pepsin. Both pepsinogen chains are capable of independent refolding. The refolding of the NH2-terminal chain, which contains the propeptide and the NH2-terminal lobe, generated a small amount of proteolytic activity which is likely derived from the homodimer of the NH2-terminal lobe. It has been postulated that mammalian aspartic proteases, which contain two structurally homologous lobes, are derived in evolution from a homodimer enzyme by gene duplication and fusion (Tang, J., James, M. N. G., Hsu, I.-N., Jenkins, J. A., and Blundell, T. L. (1978) Nature 271, 618-621). The observation of the homodimer activity of the NH2-terminal lobe of pepsinogen suggests that the interface of the lobes is conservative in evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: