Periods of restricted growth during early development are expected to have detrimental effects on subsequent metrics of fitness, most prominently increases in age and decreases in size at maturity. However, in some cases, animals may compensate by altering foraging effort, growth efficiency, or patterns of resource allocation between critical traits prior to maturation. Yet, even when compensation for age and size is complete, brief periods of restricted growth may carry costs persisting in the long term, and compensatory tactics may themselves be costly. We investigated the long-term costs of early growth restriction and mechanisms of compensatory growth in the damselfly Ischnura verticalis (Say, 1839). Larvae were temporarily exposed to one of three feeding regimes in the early stages of development, after which food levels were restored. In the period of unrestricted growth prior to emergence, partial compensation for structural size in the lowest food treatment was observed, while both resource-limited groups accelerated mass gain relative to controls. Changes in food consumption and food conversion efficiency were ruled out as mechanisms for accelerating growth following diet restriction. We tested for changes in resource allocation patterns that could explain the observed compensatory growth and found that adult body shape may depend on early growth conditions in females. There was no evidence of detrimental effects on immune function at emergence, although males tended to have higher phenoloxidase activity (a measure of immunocompetence) than females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmitriew et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: