Retrospective audit reveals frequent site-specific pain discordance after oesophagectomy, suggesting targeted regional analgesia could improve post-surgical recovery.
Topic Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer – early outcomes and complications Background Pain after oesophagectomy arises from both abdominal and thoracic components, yet patients often report unequal site-specific pain. Quantifying abdominal–thoracic pain discordance may help tailor site-targeted analgesic strategies and clarify whether robotic access reduces clinically meaningful discordance. Methods A retrospective audit of consecutive oesophagectomy patients managed within a multimodal analgesia pathway. Abdominal and thoracic pain scores (0–10 NRS) recorded on postoperative days (POD) 1–5 were extracted; for each POD, the maximum recorded score at each site was used. Discordance was calculated as thoracic minus abdominal pain (paired by patient and POD) and summarised as thorax-dominant (>0), abdomen-dominant (<0), or equal. Large discordance was prespecified as an absolute inter-site difference >3 points. Differences in large discordance by thoracic access (open vs robotic) were analysed using a population-averaged logistic model (GEE) with clustering by patient and adjustment for POD. Results A total of 131 patients contributed 647 paired patient-days. Thoracic pain exceeded abdominal pain in 39.9% of observations, abdominal exceeded thoracic in 17.0%, and scores were equal in 43.1%. Large discordance (>3 points) occurred in 21.3% of patient-days. Large discordance was more frequent following open thoracic access than robotic thoracic access (25.1% vs 17.3%). In the adjusted GEE model, open thoracic access showed higher odds of large discordance (odds ratio 1.60, 95% CI 0.97–2.65; p=0.067). Conclusion Recognising patterns of discordance may support ongoing quality improvement by enabling more targeted analgesic strategies, particularly through refinement of regional anaesthesia techniques. Open thoracic access showed a trend toward greater ldiscordance compared with robotic access. Further work should focus on identifying predictors of discordance and examining associations with opioid consumptions, mobilisation, postoperative complications and length of stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chantima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: