Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study shows intensity–complexity post-triage prioritization cuts emergency waiting times by up to 39 minutes, suggesting optimized patient flow under clinical congestion.
Emergency department triage reliably identifies patients at immediate risk, although it compresses heterogeneous clinical profiles into a small number of urgency categories, leaving discretion in how patients are prioritized within the same category. We propose a second-stage prioritization framework that makes two complementary clinical dimensions explicit: intensity (acute physiological severity) and complexity (longer-term vulnerability and management burden). Using ED triage data from a medium-large hospital, we derive patient-level intensity and complexity measures for patients assigned to a high-volume intermediate-acuity class through a domain-adapted large language model pipeline that integrates structured variables with free-text triage documentation; we validate these measures against independent physicians assessment on a representative 10% subsample. We then evaluate the operational impact using a discrete-event simulation of ED flow under congestion, comparing first-come–first-served sequencing with an intensity–complexity–aware prioritization rule. The proposed approach reduces average waiting time in the targeted class by 23–39 minutes per patient and yields spillover reductions in lower-acuity classes of approximately 24–44 minutes per patient. Robustness analyses indicate that these gains persist under alternative modeling assumptions, including a context-specific empirical non-FCFS comparator, and validation-calibrated LLM label noise. These improvements arise by limiting delay for patient profiles whose service requirements are most sensitive to waiting time, thereby mitigating downstream congestion effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marchese et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: