Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study finds no significant change in mandibular condylar trabecular complexity among patients with unilateral impacted canines, suggesting minimal structural jaw effects.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between unilateral impacted maxillary canines and mandibular condylar trabecular structure using fractal analysis on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This study included CBCT records of 50 individuals with a unilaterally impacted maxillary canine. For each participant, the condyle ipsilateral to the impacted canine was defined as the impacted side, whereas the contralateral condyle was defined as the non-impacted side. Fractal dimension (FD) values were calculated on coronal CBCT sections of the trabecular bone of the mandibular condyle. Data were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests to compare FD values between the impacted and contralateral condyles, and independent-samples t-tests for side-based comparisons. The FD values of the mandibular condyles on the impacted side were numerically higher than those of the non-impacted side; however, the difference was not statistically significant ( p > 0.05). Similarly, in individuals with right-sided impaction, higher FD values were observed in the right condyle, whereas in those with left-sided impaction, higher FD values were observed in the left condyle; however, these comparisons also were not statistically significant ( p > 0.05). The non-significant tendency toward higher FD values on the impacted side may suggest possible subtle differences in trabecular complexity; however, this finding should be interpreted with caution and requires confirmation in larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahramaner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: