Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates enhanced power generation in a magnetic-gear counter-rotating wind energy harvester, highlighting its utility for self-powered structural safety monitoring.
Wind energy is an abundant ambient power source for self-powered sensing, but conventional electromagnetic wind harvesters remain constrained under weak wind due to low rotor speed and limited magnetic flux variation. To address this issue, this paper presents a magnetic-gear-enabled Savonius-driven counter-rotating electromagnetic energy harvester (MG-SCR-EMEH) that integrates a Savonius turbine, an axial magnetic gear, and upper and lower electromagnetic power-generation modules. A non-contact magnetic speed amplification mechanism and a coaxial counter-rotating configuration triple the effective magnet-coil relative speed over direct-drive, thereby enhancing the magnetic flux variation and induction output while avoiding the wear and dissipation of contact-based frequency up-conversion. A theoretical model that combines aerodynamic drag and induced-voltage analyses, supported by finite element simulations, elucidates the mechanisms of magnetic-field modulation, torque transmission, and voltage generation. Experimental results show that the proposed MG-SCR-EMEH starts up at 3.5 m/s and, at 4.5 m/s, delivers 5.552 mW system-level equivalent charging power (27.76 mJ over 5 s into a 1 mF capacitor, 1.903 W/m 3 power density). At the same input speed of 50 RPM, increasing the magnet-coil relative speed from 50 RPM in the direct-drive configuration to 150 RPM in the magnetic-gear-coupled configuration raises the peak power from 22.78 to 166.78 mW. Furthermore, integrated with an energy-management unit, layered millimeter-wave radar nodes, and a BLE module, the MG-SCR-EMEH serves as the power source for a falling-object warning system, highlighting strong potential for low-speed wind energy harvesting and structural safety monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: