Experimental framework demonstrates accurate cotton seedling trait estimation using UAV-LiDAR and weakly supervised learning, indicating a cost-effective approach for field phenotyping.
Accurate estimation of the cotton seedling Leaf Area Index (LAI) is essential for yield prediction and precision crop management. Traditional manual methods are limited by low throughput, while two-dimensional remote sensing techniques often struggle with sparse canopy cover and soil background interference. Although three-dimensional LiDAR presents a promising alternative, existing deep learning approaches typically depend on costly fully supervised point-wise annotations. To address this challenge, this study proposes an end-to-end framework that integrates UAV-based LiDAR, weakly supervised segmentation, and physical parameter inversion. A weakly supervised network, termed CogNet, was developed—incorporating self-distillation and structure-aware label propagation—to achieve precise segmentation of cotton plants using only 10% sparse annotations. Following instance segmentation via Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN), individual plant phenotypic traits were extracted. A nonlinear Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model was then constructed to invert LAI by leveraging allometric relationships between 3D structural parameters and leaf area. Experimental results showed that CogNet achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 85.34%, effectively mitigating overfitting to label noise and achieving performance competitive with the fully supervised RandLA-Net (82.13%). Notably, under the specific conditions of this cotton seedling dataset characterized by strong geometric priors, the weakly supervised model demonstrated enhanced robustness against annotation inconsistencies. The framework attained a plant detection rate of 96.2%, and the XGBoost model delivered high estimation accuracy (R² = 0.879, RMSE = 0.138). This study demonstrates that weakly supervised learning can substantially reduce annotation costs while maintaining model performance, providing an efficient and cost-effective solution for field-scale crop phenotyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: