Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A pretest-posttest study demonstrates increased willingness to respond to disasters among health students following emergency training, highlighting effective community capacity building.
In 2024, a community–higher education partnership in the Midwest prepared public health and medical students for public health emergencies using an innovative whole-community approach of private–public collaboration. The partnership program consisted of evidence-based, workshop-style training with community resident participation. Researchers posed 2 questions before program initiation: (1) How willing were students to respond to emergencies (on a Likert-type scale of 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) before and after the program? and (2) What was the main challenge to mass-casualty drill planning and implementation for program partners? Twenty-two student participants completed a survey before and after the program, and researchers interviewed the 7 program partners after the program. We used a pretest–posttest design to assess differences in student participant self-efficacy in responding to and willingness to respond to public health emergencies. We found no significant difference from pretest (mean [SD] = 15.64 [1.84]) to posttest (mean [SD] = 16.32 [1.76]; P = .07) in the “self-efficacy in response provision” subscale. We found a significant increase in scores from pretest (mean [SD] = 14.18 [2.82]) to posttest (mean [SD] = 17.18 [2.28]; P < .001) in the “willingness to report to work and treat patients” subscale. We also found a significant positive change in subscale scores for “willingness to participate in all disaster situations” from pretest (mean [SD] = 12.41 [1.68]) to posttest (mean [SD] = 13.68 [1.36]; P = .004). The main challenge to the drill was the need for additional mock victim volunteers. When planning local drills, the whole-community approach can provide the foundation needed for community collaboration and capacity building for disaster preparedness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cox et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: