Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective controlled study demonstrates reduced closure failure with device-assisted fascial closure in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, indicating improved technical reliability.
To evaluate the technical reliability of device-assisted fascial closure at eligible non-extraction trocar sites 10 mm or larger. Peri-umbilical extraction-wound outcomes were assessed separately as secondary exploratory outcomes. This single-centre prospective non-randomized controlled study included 389 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery. The primary comparison was device-assisted versus conventional direct-vision fascial closure at eligible non-extraction trocar sites 10 mm or larger (252 vs. 137 patients). A standardized peri-umbilical extraction-wound protocol was concurrently used in the intervention group but was treated as a separate co-intervention. The primary outcome was patient-level fascial-closure failure at an eligible trocar site. Trocar-site hernia was secondary; extraction-wound morbidity and patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction on postoperative day 30 were exploratory. The groups differed in tumour site, extraction-incision location, and incision length. Eligible-site closure failure occurred in 0/252 intervention patients and 4/137 controls (risk difference, -2.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -7.3 to -0.6; P = 0.015). A separate 5-mm drain-tract event occurred in one intervention patient. Trocar-site hernia was uncommon (0 vs. 1 case; P = 0.352). Exploratory extraction-wound hernia and wound-morbidity outcomes did not differ significantly; patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was higher in the intervention group in an unadjusted comparison (mean difference, 0.30 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.40; P < 0.001). Device-assisted closure was associated with fewer eligible-site technical failures. Non-randomized allocation, sparse events, and potential operator confounding preclude claims of device superiority or hernia prevention. Findings from the concurrent extraction-wound protocol were separate exploratory results and should not be attributed to the closure forceps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: