The kinetics of pressure-induced phase separation (PIPS) in solutions of polyethylene ( M w = 108 000, PDI = 1.32) in n -pentane has been studied using time- and angle-resolved light scattering. Controlled pressure quench experiments were conducted at different polymer concentrations (0.49, 0.97, 2.07, 2.8, 4.1, 5.0, and 10.8% by mass) to determine both the binodal and spinodal envelopes and the critical polymer concentration. At each concentration, a series of rapid pressure quenches with different depths of penetration into the region of immiscibility were imposed, and the time evolutions of the scattered light intensities were followed to determine the pressure below which the mechanism changes from “nucleation and growth” to “spinodal decomposition”. The crossover is identified from the characteristic fingerprint scattering patterns associated with each mechanism. The spinodal decomposition process is characterized by the formation and evolution of a spinodal ring during phase separation that leads to a maximum in the angular variation of the scattered light intensity. The nucleation and growth mechanism is characterized by the absence of such a maximum and the continual decrease of the scattered light intensities with increasing angles. The time scale of new phase formation and growth is shown to be relatively short. The late stage of phase separation is entered within seconds. For quenches leading to spinodal decomposition, the characteristic wavenumber q m corresponding to the scattered light intensity maximum I m is observed to be nonstationary, moving to lower wavenumbers after a very short elapsed time. The growth of domain size is observed to follow power-law-type scaling with q m ∼ t -α and I m ∼ t β with β ≈ 2α. In the intermediate and late stages, the domain size is found to grow from 4 to 14 μm within 5 s. Analysis of the early stage of phase separation according to Cahn−Hilliard theory shows that the diffusion coefficients are in the range of (1−9) × 10 -12 m 2 /s and depend on the quench depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: