Why the study?
Do biographical data and psychological traits predict the duration and outcome of inpatient therapy in neurotic versus endogenous depressive subjects?
Do biographical data and psychological traits predict the duration and outcome of inpatient therapy in neurotic versus endogenous depressive subjects?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biographical variables and psychological traits like neuroticism and aim-relatedness have differential prognostic effects on therapy outcomes in neurotic versus endogenous depression.
Biographical data are not significantly influenced by depressive mood and depressive cognition. For endogenous depressives there is no significant predictive effect of biographical variables on duration and outcome of therapy. However, neurotic depressives show a significant predictive effect of neuroticism and of aim-relatedness on changes of mood. There is no significant difference in the duration of inpatient treatment for neurotic and endogenous depressives. Neurotic and endogenous depressives do not differ in mean SDS-score at the beginning of inpatient treatment. Neurotic depressives show less improvement in depressivity but both types of depression show a significant improvement during inpatient therapy. The depressive groups show significantly higher scores on the scale "neuroticism" and significantly lower scores on the scale "aim-relatedness and unspecific motivation", whereas the healthy controls show significantly lower or rather higher scores on those variables. Neurotic depressive subjects show significantly higher scores on "aim-relatedness and unspecific motivation" as well as a significantly higher "mean subjective stress index" whereas endogenous depressive subjects show significantly lower scores on both scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siegfried Geyer (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: