Why the study?
Do imaging techniques like carotid IMT and coronary CT predict cardiovascular prognosis in women and children?
Do imaging techniques like carotid IMT and coronary CT predict cardiovascular prognosis in women and children?
Carotid IMT by ultrasound is a preferred, safer method compared to CT for early detection and prognostication of atherosclerosis in women and children.
May guide safer imaging choices in women and children; leaves open prospective validation versus CT.
This review reports our experience in evaluating the progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic atherosclerosis in an evidence-based context. In particular, studies published in the last 5 years were analyzed in more detail and their relevance to cardiovascular prevention in women and children is discussed. The evaluation of carotid artery intima-media thickness by ultrasonography and the measurement of coronary artery calcification using computed tomography scanning can provide evidence for the presence and extent of atherosclerosis in adults. Intima-media thickness was demonstrated to predict prognosis and help in clinical decision making. Computed tomography estimates of advanced coronary atherosclerosis are markers of advanced atherosclerosis and are of value for screening adult men, but their value in women and children is doubtful owing to radiation risk. Intima-media thickness measurement, even when acknowledging its limitations, is a preferred approach, with the promising perspective of the availability of portable devices of lower cost in the near future. Further evaluation of the potential role for the emerging biomarkers and imaging techniques could clarify the clinical relevance of emerging risk profiles such as the metabolic syndrome. Ultrasound methods provide information regarding the extent and progression of early atherosclerotic abnormalities in women and in children and predict cardiovascular prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rubba et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: