Key result
2D global longitudinal RV strain showed a weak but significant correlation with CMR-derived RV ejection fraction (R = -0.4, P = 0.01) in unoperated patients with Ebstein's anomaly.
Why the study?
Do non-volumetric echocardiographic indices correlate with CMR-derived right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with Ebstein's anomaly?
Cross-Sectional (n=49)
Do non-volumetric echocardiographic indices correlate with CMR-derived right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with Ebstein's anomaly?
Effect estimate: R = -0.4
p-value: p=0.01
Echocardiographic parameters of RV function correlate poorly with CMR-derived EF in patients with Ebstein's anomaly, with only 2D-GLS showing a weak correlation.
Poor echo-CMR RV correlation in Ebstein's anomaly cautions against substituting 2D-GLS for EF; leaves open need for validated non-volumetric indices.
AIMS: Ebstein's anomaly (EA) is often associated with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Data on echocardiographic quantification of RV function are, however, rare. The aim of this study was to determine how non-volumetric echocardiographic indices and qualitative assessment of global systolic RV function correlate with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived RV ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared six echocardiographic indices and qualitative assessment of RV function with the gold standard CMR. A total of 49 unoperated patients with EA and a mean age of 32 ± 18 years were examined. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tissue Doppler myocardial velocities (peak S and IVA) and 2D strain and strain rate measures for the RV were compared with CMR-derived EF. Only 2D global longitudinal strain (2D-GLS), out of the six parameters investigated, showed a weak, although statistically significant correlation with CMR-derived RVEF (R = -0.4, P = 0.01). Using a cut-off value of -20.15, 2D-GLS sensitivity (77%) and specificity (46%) in detecting patients with a CMR-derived EF of <50% were comparable with qualitative assessment (sensitivity 77%, specificity 45%). CONCLUSION: Overall echocardiographic parameters of RV function correlate poorly with CMR-derived EF in patients with EA. Only 2D global longitudinal RV strain correlated weakly with CMR-derived RVEF. However, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting RV dysfunction using 2D strain imaging were comparable with qualitative RV functional assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kühn et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Ebstein's anomaly (n=49). Non-volumetric echocardiographic indices and qualitative assessment vs. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived RV ejection fraction was evaluated on Correlation of echocardiographic indices with CMR-derived RVEF (R = -0.4, p=0.01). 2D global longitudinal RV strain showed a weak but significant correlation with CMR-derived RV ejection fraction (R = -0.4, P = 0.01) in unoperated patients with Ebstein's anomaly.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: