Key result
An upright T wave in lead aVR was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death in patients with ischemic stroke (HR 3.04; 95% CI 1.07-8.64).
Why the study?
Does an upright T wave in lead aVR predict cardiovascular death and stroke recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=625)
Does an upright T wave in lead aVR predict cardiovascular death and stroke recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke?
Hazard Ratio: 3.04 (95% CI 1.07–8.64)
An upright T wave in lead aVR on baseline ECG is an independent predictor of cardiovascular death and recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with a recent ischemic stroke.
May support ECG risk stratification post-stroke; leaves open whether it improves outcomes or warrants prospective validation.
Background Upright T wave in lead aVR (TaVR) has recently been reported to be associated with cardiovascular death and mortality in general population and in patients with prior cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the evidence for the predictive ability of TaVR in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) is lacking. Methods A total of 625 consecutive patients with IS (mean age: 66 ± 12 years; 379 male) were enrolled in this study between January 2013 and December 2014. Patients were divided into upright TaVR (≥0 mV; n = 201) and negative TaVR (<0 mV; n = 424) groups. All patients were evaluated with respect to clinical features and in‐hospital clinical results. Results Overall, the prevalence of upright TaVR was 32.2% at baseline. Patients with an upright TaVR were older, had a higher percentage of CVD and hypertension, higher level of MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CKMB), faster heart rate, higher rate of QT prolongation > 450 ms, higher rate of negative T in lead II, higher rate of negative T in lead V6, higher rate of ST depression, and longer QTc duration. During the mean follow‐up period of 20.0 ± 5.8 months, 29 (4.6%) patients experienced all‐cause death and 12 (1.9%) patients experienced cardiovascular death, the primary end point. Concomitantly, 94 (15%) patients experienced recurrence of IS, the secondary end point. After adjusting for clinical covariates, upright TaVR was independently associated with all‐cause death [hazard ratio (HR): 2.88, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.07–7.73], cardiovascular death (HR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.07–8.64), and IS recurrence (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.08–3.20). Conclusions Upright TaVR in patients with IS is associated with increased mortality and recurrence of IS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Ischemic stroke (n=625). Upright T wave in lead aVR (≥0 mV) vs. Negative T wave in lead aVR (<0 mV) was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.07-8.64). An upright T wave in lead aVR was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death in patients with ischemic stroke (HR 3.04; 95% CI 1.07-8.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: