This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Can concepts such as loyalty and integrity remain intrinsically valuable personal traits even as we devote ourselves to that which requires the loyalty in the first place (the greater good)? Does utilitarian deliberation rest on too extreme a notion of impartiality—one that focuses exclusively on the consequences of actions, leaving people, in the words of Bernard Williams, “mere faceless numbers”? Using the film Casablanca as an extended analogy, this article attempts to reconcile the concept of loyalty to a cause, as described by Josiah Royce, with Williams's argument that personal integrity can remain part of even utilitarian thought processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas H. Bivins (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: