Immunohistochemical markers like actin and CD-31 may help differentiate hypoxic lesions in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, though apoptosis markers are confounded by post-mortem autolysis.
Limits apoptosis marker use in autolyzed tissue; leaves open actin/CD-31 validation for hypoxic lesions in HCM models.
There are several hypotheses concerning the pathogenesis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (genetic, ischaemic, immune, inflammatory and apoptosis induction). We have studied three types of cardiomyopathy in order to observe the expression and assess the significance of different immunohistochemical markers (muscular actin, CD-31, proliferation cell nuclear antigen -PCNA-, Ki-67, and markers related with programmed cell death, bcl-2, p-53 and apopDETEC). We studied different microscopic (haematoxylin-eosin and Masson's thrichrome) and immunohistochemical parameters (streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase and "in situ" hybridisation) of forty cases: ten each of hypertensive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, essential hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in patients treated with chemotherapy and morphologically "normal" hearts. Our findings point to an absence of structural marker expression (actin and CD-31) in cases of hypoxic damage. The distribution and intensity of apoptosis markers, a seen by "in situ" hybridisation were irregular, and the rest of the markers studied showed negative results, with the exception of acridin orange (a marker of hypoxic damage). In our opinion, the above immunohistochemical markers, especially actin and CD-31, could be used for differentiating hypoxic lesions in these three types of cardiomyopathy. Moreover, it is difficult to know the significance of the apoptosis markers, because the autolysis process produces cross reactions with false positive results. We think that there is a need for new studies on DNA breakdown processes during the post-mortem interval. To avoid autolysis problems the post-mortem material needs to be as fresh as possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez-Díaz et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy