Why the study?
Does the timing of ajmaline administration (pre- vs post-occlusion) affect its efficacy against ischaemia- and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in rats?
Does the timing of ajmaline administration (pre- vs post-occlusion) affect its efficacy against ischaemia- and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in rats?
The efficacy of ajmaline against reperfusion-induced arrhythmias depends on pre-occlusion administration to achieve adequate myocardial drug concentrations.
Pre-occlusion ajmaline abolishes reperfusion arrhythmias via adequate myocardial levels in rats; leaves open clinical translation.
Antiarrhythmic actions of ajmaline against ischaemia (left coronary artery occlusion for 15 min) and subsequent reperfusion-induced arrhythmias were investigated in anaesthetized rats. 2. Ajmaline (2 mg kg-1, i.v.) was effective in suppressing ischaemia-induced arrhythmias whether given pre- or post-occlusion. 3. Ajmaline diminished the reperfusion-induced arrhythmias completely when given pre-occlusion but had little effect when given post-occlusion. 4. Reperfusion-induced increases in plasma enzyme activities of lactate dehydrogenase, glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase and creatine phosphokinase were prevented more effectively when ajmaline was given pre-occlusion rather than post-occlusion. 5. Fifteen min post-occlusion, the ajmaline concentrations in the ischaemic ventricle were 18.42 +/- 1.66 and 1.18 +/- 0.15 micrograms g-1 for pre- and post-occlusion administration, respectively. However, ajmaline concentrations in whole blood and normal ventricle were not significantly different between pre- and post-occlusion administration. 6. We suggest that the beneficial effect of ajmaline against reperfusion-induced arrhythmias is related to the ischaemic myocardial concentration of ajmaline which is markedly affected by the time of drug administration (i.e. pre- and post-occlusion).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okumura et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: